Valdriche v. State

807 So. 2d 169, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1395, 2002 WL 215224
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 2002·No. No. 3D01-1427·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No error has been demonstrated either on the substantive point presented, see Johnson v. State, 786 So.2d 1162 (Fla.2001), or in the upward departure sentence. § 921.0016(3), Fla. Stat. (1997). See McCallister v. State, 716 So.2d 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Semenec v. State, 698 So.2d 900 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Davis v. State, 700 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valdriche v. State, 807 So. 2d 169, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1395, 2002 WL 215224 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

807 So. 2d 169 (Valdriche v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCallister v. State
716 So. 2d 821 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Semenec v. State
698 So. 2d 900 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Johnson v. State
786 So. 2d 1162 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Davis v. State
700 So. 2d 130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)