Valdivieso v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Valdivieso v. State

90 So. 3d 376, 2012 WL 2579592, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10801

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 5, 2012

DocketNo. 4D10-5323

StatusPublished

This text of 90 So. 3d 376 (Valdivieso v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valdivieso v. State, 90 So. 3d 376, 2012 WL 2579592, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10801 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing and Clarification

PER CURIAM.

Defendant files a motion for clarification and rehearing after this Court per curiam affirmed the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

We grant his motion and withdraw the previous opinion. Upon reconsideration of the record, we find that Defendant’s August 23, 2010 motion for postconviction relief was untimely. State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208 (Fla.2006). Padilla v. Kentucky, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively to this 2004 plea. See Davis v. State, 69 So.3d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (citing Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)); Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing and Clarification

PER CURIAM.

Defendant files a motion for clarification and rehearing after this Court per curiam affirmed the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

We grant his motion and withdraw the previous opinion. Upon reconsideration of the record, we find that Defendant’s August 23, 2010 motion for postconviction relief was untimely. State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208 (Fla.2006). Padilla v. Kentucky, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively to this 2004 plea. See Davis v. State, 69 So.3d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (citing Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)); Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 So. 3d 376, 2012 WL 2579592, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valdivieso-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack