Valdivia-Avila v. Holder
This text of 333 F. App'x 262 (Valdivia-Avila v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Luis Aurelio Valdivia-Avila, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for adjustment of status. We dismiss the appeal.
We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary denial of Valdivia-Avila’s application for adjustment of status. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Bazua-Cota v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 747, 748 (9th Cir.2006) (per curiam). Valdivia-Avila’s contention that the IJ improperly weighed the evidence in his case does not present a color-able constitutional claim or question of law over which this court may exercise jurisdiction. See Bazua-Cota, 466 F.3d at 749.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
333 F. App'x 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valdivia-avila-v-holder-ca9-2009.