Valdez v. W & E Trading Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Valdez v. W & E Trading Corp.

777 So. 2d 1130, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 843, 2001 WL 76564

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 2001·No. No. 3D00-1116·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Franklin E. Valdez appeals an adverse final judgment after jury trial. We conclude that the evidence in the case was subject to conflicting interpretations and the case was properly submitted to the jury. We see no error in the denial of the appellant’s motions for directed verdict and new trial. See Jones v. Airport Rent-A-Car, Inc., 342 So.2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Levine v. Frank, 311 So.2d 708 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Franklin E. Valdez appeals an adverse final judgment after jury trial. We conclude that the evidence in the case was subject to conflicting interpretations and the case was properly submitted to the jury. We see no error in the denial of the appellant’s motions for directed verdict and new trial. See Jones v. Airport Rent-A-Car, Inc., 342 So.2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Levine v. Frank, 311 So.2d 708 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Valdez v. W & E Trading Corp., 777 So. 2d 1130, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 843, 2001 WL 76564 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

777 So. 2d 1130 (Valdez v. W & E Trading Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related