Valdez v. W & E Trading Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Valdez v. W & E Trading Corp.

777 So. 2d 1130, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 843, 2001 WL 76564

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 31, 2001

DocketNo. 3D00-1116

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 777 So. 2d 1130 (Valdez v. W & E Trading Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valdez v. W & E Trading Corp., 777 So. 2d 1130, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 843, 2001 WL 76564 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Franklin E. Valdez appeals an adverse final judgment after jury trial. We conclude that the evidence in the case was subject to conflicting interpretations and the case was properly submitted to the jury. We see no error in the denial of the appellant’s motions for directed verdict and new trial. See Jones v. Airport Rent-A-Car, Inc., 342 So.2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Levine v. Frank, 311 So.2d 708 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Franklin E. Valdez appeals an adverse final judgment after jury trial. We conclude that the evidence in the case was subject to conflicting interpretations and the case was properly submitted to the jury. We see no error in the denial of the appellant’s motions for directed verdict and new trial. See Jones v. Airport Rent-A-Car, Inc., 342 So.2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Levine v. Frank, 311 So.2d 708 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

777 So. 2d 1130, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 843, 2001 WL 76564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valdez-v-w-e-trading-corp-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack