Valdez v. Consolidated Property & Casualty
This text of 762 So. 2d 1034 (Valdez v. Consolidated Property & Casualty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Valdez appeals a final judgment voiding his insurance policy. For the following reasons, we affirm.
The insurance .policy contained a valid provision voiding the policy upon intentional concealment or misrepresentation by the insured. See Wong Ken v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 685 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (clause which voids coverage for intentional misrepresentation is valid and enforceable). The jury found that Valdez violated that provision. Therefore, the trial court properly voided the insurance policy.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
762 So. 2d 1034, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9406, 2000 WL 1021971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valdez-v-consolidated-property-casualty-fladistctapp-2000.