Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Valdez v. Cibulski

Valdez v. Cibulski

248 A.D.2d 707, 670 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3409
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 30, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 A.D.2d 707 (Valdez v. Cibulski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valdez v. Cibulski, 248 A.D.2d 707, 670 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., nonparties Kenneth L. Brown and Rivkin, Radler & Kremer appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated December 17, 1996, which imposed a $10,000 sanction upon them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in imposing a sanction against the appellants for engaging in frivolous conduct (see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c] [1], [2]).

O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pronti v. Grigoriou
64 A.D.3d 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D.2d 707, 670 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valdez-v-cibulski-nyappdiv-1998.