Valdez v. Cibulski
248 A.D.2d 707, 670 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3409
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 30, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., nonparties Kenneth L. Brown and Rivkin, Radler & Kremer appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated December 17, 1996, which imposed a $10,000 sanction upon them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in imposing a sanction against the appellants for engaging in frivolous conduct (see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c] [1], [2]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Valdez v. Cibulski, 248 A.D.2d 707, 670 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).
248 A.D.2d 707 (Valdez v. Cibulski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pronti v. Grigoriou
64 A.D.3d 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)