Valdez-Paz v. Demello
This text of Valdez-Paz v. Demello (Valdez-Paz v. Demello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 08-JUN-2026 08:01 AM Dkt. 7 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
REYNALDO VALDES-PAZ, Petitioner,
vs.
GENE DEMELLO, JR., Chairperson of the Hawaiʻi Paroling Authority, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, State of Hawaiʻi; TOMMY JOHNSON, Director of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, State of Hawaiʻi; and SHANNON CLUNEY, Warden of the Halawa Correctional Facility, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondents. ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER DENYING PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Costa, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas
corpus filed June 3, 2026, and the record, expedited relief is
available to Petitioner in the circuit court through the post-
conviction process. See Hawaiʻi Rules of Penal Procedure Rule
40(d) (eff. 2006) (“Where the petition makes a showing of
entitlement to immediate relief, the court may shorten the time
in which to respond to the petition.”). Also, habeas corpus petitions that require an evidentiary
hearing must be filed in the circuit court rather than this
court. See Eason v. State, 157 Hawaiʻi 252, 268, 576 P.3d 765,
781 (2025) (observing that, in Oili v. Chang, 57 Haw. 411, 412,
557 P.2d 787, 788 (1976), we declined to proceed on this court’s
concurrent jurisdiction where an evidentiary hearing was
required and relief was available in the circuit court); Matter
of Individuals in Custody of State, No. SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX, 2021 WL
4762901, at *15 (Haw. Oct. 12, 2021) (McKenna, J., concurring
and dissenting) (“Habeas petitions requiring evidentiary
hearings, however, must be filed in the circuit courts.”).
Thus, relief is available to Petitioner in the circuit court,
and we do not find that a special reason exists to invoke this
court’s original jurisdiction. See Oili, 57 Haw. at 412, 557
P.2d at 788.
It is ordered that the petition is denied without prejudice
to Petitioner seeking habeas corpus relief in the circuit court.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, June 8, 2026.
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Brian A. Costa
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Valdez-Paz v. Demello, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valdez-paz-v-demello-haw-2026.