Valdez, Justin Todd
This text of Valdez, Justin Todd (Valdez, Justin Todd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,807-01
EX PARTE JUSTIN VALDEZ, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR AN ORIGINAL WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 41070 IN THE COUNTY COURT OF LAW OF CALDWELL COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to this Court’s original jurisdiction to issue writs of habeas corpus, Applicant
presents a motion for leave to file an original application for a writ of habeas corpus. TEX . CONST .
art. V, § 5(c); TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 4.04 § 1. Applicant alleges he pleaded nolo contendere,
was convicted of assault, and sentenced to community supervision. The Third Court of Appeals
affirmed his conviction. Valdez v. State, No. 03-12-00098-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 29, 2014)
(not designated for publication).
Applicant contends that counsel was ineffective for not pursuing discretionary review in a
timely fashion and that he has no other adequate remedy at law to pursue an out-of-time petition for
discretionary review. He contends that the State is not opposed to habeas relief on this claim. 2
Before this Court considers whether exercising jurisdiction in this case is appropriate, the
State is invited to respond to Applicant’s writ claims.
Applicant’s motion for leave to file an application for a writ of habeas corpus shall be held
in abeyance for 30 days from the date of this order. The State may submit any response during that
time.
Filed: March 25, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Valdez, Justin Todd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valdez-justin-todd-texcrimapp-2015.