Valdes v. State

323 So. 2d 690, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18997
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 16, 1975
DocketNo. 75-627
StatusPublished

This text of 323 So. 2d 690 (Valdes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valdes v. State, 323 So. 2d 690, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18997 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of aiding in the conduct of a lottery. After judgment and sentence, his appeal raised the question of the sufficiency of the affidavit upon which the search warrant was issued; therefore, a question solely of law is raised, i. e., is the affidavit insufficient as a matter of law. State v. Ashby, Fla. 1971, 245 So.2d 225. Our review of the record shows that the affidavit is not insufficient as a matter of law. See State v. Smith, Fla.1970, 233 So.2d 396; and Hicks v. State, Fla.App. 1974, 299 So.2d 44.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ashby
245 So. 2d 225 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
State v. Smith
233 So. 2d 396 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)
Hicks v. State
299 So. 2d 44 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 So. 2d 690, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valdes-v-state-fladistctapp-1975.