Valderrama v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Valderrama v. State

462 So. 2d 100, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 200, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11949

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 15, 1985

DocketNo. 84-948

StatusPublished

This text of 462 So. 2d 100 (Valderrama v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valderrama v. State, 462 So. 2d 100, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 200, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11949 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgments of conviction and sentences under review are affirmed upon a holding that the evidence error complained of was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt adduced at trial against the defendant Javier Yalderrama, including the defendant’s own trial testimony. Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 93 S.Ct. 1565, 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973); Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final judgments of conviction and sentences under review are affirmed upon a holding that the evidence error complained of was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt adduced at trial against the defendant Javier Yalderrama, including the defendant’s own trial testimony. Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 93 S.Ct. 1565, 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973); Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

462 So. 2d 100, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 200, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valderrama-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack