Valcin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Valcin v. State

760 So. 2d 231, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5806, 2000 WL 628605

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 17, 2000

DocketNo. 99-3095

StatusPublished

This text of 760 So. 2d 231 (Valcin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valcin v. State, 760 So. 2d 231, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5806, 2000 WL 628605 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the lower court’s denial of the appellant’s 3.800 motion. We, however, remand this case for correction of a scrivener’s error on count III of the appellant’s sentencing sheet. See Ricks v. State, 725 So.2d 1205, 1206 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). At the sentencing hearing, the trial court orally pronounced that the appellant was being sentenced as a habitual violent offender on count III. The sentencing sheet, however, does not reflect that he was so sentenced. Accordingly, this error must be corrected on remand. A •written order must conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncements. See Sconiers v. State, 734 So.2d 427, 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the lower court’s denial of the appellant’s 3.800 motion. We, however, remand this case for correction of a scrivener’s error on count III of the appellant’s sentencing sheet. See Ricks v. State, 725 So.2d 1205, 1206 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). At the sentencing hearing, the trial court orally pronounced that the appellant was being sentenced as a habitual violent offender on count III. The sentencing sheet, however, does not reflect that he was so sentenced. Accordingly, this error must be corrected on remand. A •written order must conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncements. See Sconiers v. State, 734 So.2d 427, 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

760 So. 2d 231, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5806, 2000 WL 628605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valcin-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack