Valcin v. State

690 So. 2d 610, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 273, 1997 WL 31102
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 29, 1997·No. No. 96-14·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.190(h)(4); Jones v. State, 580 So.2d 143 (Fla.)(no appellate review unless attorney states grounds for motion for judgment of acquittal), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 878, 112 S.Ct. 221, 116 L.Ed.2d 179 (1991); Lachos v. State, 339 So.2d 217 (Fla.l976)(can amend victim’s name in information); Cortes v. State, 670 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)(no error in restriction of victim’s cross-examinations); Johnson v. State, 478 So.2d 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). See Williams v. State, 591 So.2d 319 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)(requested instruction subsumed by standard instruction).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valcin v. State, 690 So. 2d 610, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 273, 1997 WL 31102 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

690 So. 2d 610 (Valcin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Passerrello v. Robert L. Lipton, Inc.
690 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)