Valcarcel v. Edelstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Valcarcel v. Edelstein

115 A.D.2d 481, 496 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54867

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 1985·Published

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent dated January 18, 1985, which denied petitioner’s application for a pistol permit and a dealer’s permit.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of respondent was supported by substantial evidence in the record and was neither arbitrary nor capricious (see, Matter of Jenkins v Martin, 99 AD2d 811). Good cause existed for the denial of the permit (see, Penal Law § 400.00 [1] [d]). Brown, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent dated January 18, 1985, which denied petitioner’s application for a pistol permit and a dealer’s permit.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of respondent was supported by substantial evidence in the record and was neither arbitrary nor capricious (see, Matter of Jenkins v Martin, 99 AD2d 811). Good cause existed for the denial of the permit (see, Penal Law § 400.00 [1] [d]). Brown, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Valcarcel v. Edelstein, 115 A.D.2d 481, 496 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

115 A.D.2d 481 (Valcarcel v. Edelstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related