Valandschoot v. Adams
This text of 61 Ill. 368 (Valandschoot v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are asked to reverse this judgment solely on the ground that the verdict is against the evidence. It is not against, but clearly sustained by the evidence, if-the testimony of Buse can be believed. Upon that question the jury were, surely, the proper judges. They had the witness before them, and thought him entitled to belief, and there is nothing in this record showing he was not. Ho attempt was made to impeach his character, and the statements which several witnesses swear he made to them at different times during the last two years, in regard to the matter in controversy, only differ from his evidence in minor and immaterial particulars.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 Ill. 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valandschoot-v-adams-ill-1871.