Val Gian Bay Shore Hotel, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Val Gian Bay Shore Hotel, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

29 A.D.2d 539, 285 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2871

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 4, 1967·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, respondent’s determination dated March 14, 1967 and effective March 17, 1967, canceling the corporate petitioner’s restaurant liquor license on the ground that conduct of said petitioner’s president was in violation of subdivision 14 of rule 36 of respondent’s rules (9 HYCRR 53.1 [n]), modified by striking out the provision which cancelled petitioner’s license, annulling such cancellation and substituting therefor a provision suspending petitioner’s license [540] for 45 days commencing as of March 17, 1967. As so modified, determination confirmed, without costs. In our opinion, under the circumstances, the punishment of a revocation of the petitioner’s license was excessive. Motion by petitioners to stay enforcement of respondent’s determination canceling the corporate petitioner’s restaurant liquor license, pending the proceeding to review said determination. Motion dismissed as academic. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, respondent’s determination dated March 14, 1967 and effective March 17, 1967, canceling the corporate petitioner’s restaurant liquor license on the ground that conduct of said petitioner’s president was in violation of subdivision 14 of rule 36 of respondent’s rules (9 HYCRR 53.1 [n]), modified by striking out the provision which cancelled petitioner’s license, annulling such cancellation and substituting therefor a provision suspending petitioner’s license [540] for 45 days commencing as of March 17, 1967. As so modified, determination confirmed, without costs. In our opinion, under the circumstances, the punishment of a revocation of the petitioner’s license was excessive. Motion by petitioners to stay enforcement of respondent’s determination canceling the corporate petitioner’s restaurant liquor license, pending the proceeding to review said determination. Motion dismissed as academic. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Val Gian Bay Shore Hotel, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority, 29 A.D.2d 539, 285 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

29 A.D.2d 539 (Val Gian Bay Shore Hotel, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related