Val Construction Inc. and Raciel Juarez v. Dr. Agustin Martinez, M.D. and A&J Martinez, LP

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 12, 2025·No. 13-25-00374-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-25-00374-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

VAL CONSTRUCTION INC. AND RACIEL JUAREZ, Appellants,

v.

DR. AGUSTIN MARTINEZ, M.D. AND A&J MARTINEZ, LP, Appellees.

ON APPEAL FROM THE 93RD DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Silva, Peña, and Cron Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña

This matter is before the Court on appellants’ motion to dismiss notice of appeal.

On July 28, 2025, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that it appeared the order they

are attempting to appeal was unappealable. Appellants were further notified that if the

defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of the notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P 37.1, 42.3. Appellants did not cure

the defect and instead filed the motion to dismiss which is now before the Court.

The Court, having considered appellants’ motion to dismiss notice of appeal and

appellant’s failure to correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal

should be dismissed. See id. R. 42.1(1). Accordingly, appellants’ motion to dismiss is

granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

L. ARON PEÑA JR. Justice

Delivered and filed on the 12th day of August, 2025.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Val Construction Inc. and Raciel Juarez v. Dr. Agustin Martinez, M.D. and A&J Martinez, LP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Val Construction Inc. and Raciel Juarez v. Dr. Agustin Martinez, M.D. and A&J Martinez, LP (Val Construction Inc. and Raciel Juarez v. Dr. Agustin Martinez, M.D. and A&J Martinez, LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.