Vaintraub v. Balsams, Inc.
This text of 1 A.D.2d 773 (Vaintraub v. Balsams, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously modified so as to settle the ease on appeal as proposed by appellant, but substituting for the medical testimony a statement that plaintiff claims a dislocation of the foot resulting from a fall allegedly caused by defendant’s negligence and that a doctor testified to a dislocation which could have been caused by such a fall. On the argument of the appeal from the judgment, appellant will hand up to the court the stenographic transcript of the minutes of the trial and either party may refer to such transcript in its brief or argument. Concur — Peck, P. J., Bastow, Rabin, Cox and Prank, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.2d 773, 149 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaintraub-v-balsams-inc-nyappdiv-1956.