Vailant v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 675 (Vailant v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To vacate orders setting aside defaults taken by plaintiffs for want of pleas.
Denied November 21, 1894, with costs.
Plaintiffs had ignored defendants’ demands for bills of particulars, had taken their defaults, which had been set aside, and plaintiffs were ordered to furnish such bills. Plaintiffs then furnished bills of particulars which defendants regarded as insufficient, and so notified plaintiffs’ attorney.
Defendants neglected to plead and plaintiffs entered defaults the second time.
Defendants then moved that plaintiffs be non-suited for failure to furnish bills of particulars. The court, upon that hearing, determined that -the bills were insufficient, set aside the defaults and ordered further bills to be furnished, and it is of this action that relators complain.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vailant-v-circuit-judge-mich-1894.