Vail v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vail v. State

433 S.W.3d 476, 2014 WL 2519989, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 616

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 3, 2014·No. No. ED 100611·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arlando Vail appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R.Crim. P. 29.15 (2013). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude an ex[477] tended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arlando Vail appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R.Crim. P. 29.15 (2013). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude an ex[477] tended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2013).

Vail v. State, 433 S.W.3d 476, 2014 WL 2519989, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 616 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

433 S.W.3d 476 (Vail v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.