Vail v. Nickerson
6 Mass. 262
Opinion
When a plaintiff in an action upon contract is delayed of his judgment by the unsuccessful motion of the defendant for a new trial, or when the defendant fails of establishing exceptions, &c., the clerk shall of course add to the amount found due by the verdict, interest thereon from the time it was returned to the day of entering the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vail v. Nickerson, 6 Mass. 262 (Mass. 1810).
6 Mass. 262 (Vail v. Nickerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nelson v. Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co.
189 A. 591 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1937)
Wright v. State
135 So. 636 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1931)
Hawkes v. Lackey
93 N.E. 828 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Johnson v. Atlantic & St. Lawrence Railroad
43 N.H. 410 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1861)
Williams v. President, Directors of American Bank
45 Mass. 317 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1842)
Peirce v. Rowe
1 N.H. 179 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1818)