Vail v. Fall Creek Turnpike Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Vail v. Fall Creek Turnpike Co.

32 Ind. 198

DecidedNovember 15, 1869

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Ind. 198 (Vail v. Fall Creek Turnpike Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vail v. Fall Creek Turnpike Co., 32 Ind. 198 (Ind. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Frazer, C. J.

The appellee commenced proceedings before a justice of the peace, under the statute (1 G. & H. 4'75) to condemn, for the way of its road, the lands of the appellant, and it appealed to the circuit court from the judgment of the justice therein. In the circuit court, on leave, it dismissed its proceedings, voluntarily, at its own costs. The appellant comes here to question the correctness of this action of the circuit court. We think that there was no error, and that the matter is too plain to justify us in- any discussion upon the subject.

Affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazer, C. J.

The appellee commenced proceedings before a justice of the peace, under the statute (1 G. & H. 4'75) to condemn, for the way of its road, the lands of the appellant, and it appealed to the circuit court from the judgment of the justice therein. In the circuit court, on leave, it dismissed its proceedings, voluntarily, at its own costs. The appellant comes here to question the correctness of this action of the circuit court. We think that there was no error, and that the matter is too plain to justify us in- any discussion upon the subject.

Affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Ind. 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vail-v-fall-creek-turnpike-co-ind-1869.