Vail v. Derwinski
This text of 956 F.2d 812 (Vail v. Derwinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied. Rehearing by the panel is also denied. The motion to certify the case to the Supreme Court of Minnesota is overruled. The panel opinion filed October 8, 1991, is hereby amended by adding footnote 11 to page 11, end of first full paragraph [946 F.2d 589, 594 (8th Cir.1991) ], after the words “foreclosure sale” as follows:
11. After this opinion was filed, the government has called to our attention that 38 U.S.C. § 1832(a)(4)(A) was amended in 1987 imposing a duty on the agency to provide notification to the veteran upon a showing of default. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 3732(a)(4)(A) (1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
956 F.2d 812, 1992 WL 23567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vail-v-derwinski-ca8-1992.