Vaida v. Vidar Dry Wall
This text of 77 A.D.2d 721 (Vaida v. Vidar Dry Wall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 4, 1979, which disallowed a claim for compensation under the Workers’ Compensation Law. The board’s decision states: "The majority of the Board Panel finds the neurological medical reports and the testimony of Dr. Gould fail to show any causally related hysterical conversion; further that the claimant has no further causally related disability and need of treatment; further that there is no evidence to excuse late filing by Dr. Nestor J. Totero.” We have consistently held that questions of credibility, reasonableness and weight of medical proof are for the board to decide (Matter of Lagona v Starpoint Cent. School, 50 AD2d 236, affd 40 NY2d 1034). There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board (see Matter of Jennette v Dock & Coal Co., 22 AD2d 732). Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 A.D.2d 721, 430 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaida-v-vidar-dry-wall-nyappdiv-1980.