Vahey v. Steward

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vahey v. Steward

375 S.W.3d 834, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 798, 2012 WL 2107961

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2012·No. No. ED 97831·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David R. Steward appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to modify a previous judgment dissolving his marriage to Shelley C. Vahey. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no error. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David R. Steward appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to modify a previous judgment dissolving his marriage to Shelley C. Vahey. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no error. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Vahey v. Steward, 375 S.W.3d 834, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 798, 2012 WL 2107961 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

375 S.W.3d 834 (Vahey v. Steward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.