Vague v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Harvey Grad Harvey Grad, PS 323 Queen Anne Ave. N., Ste. 102 Seattle, WA 98109 O 206.331.3927 Attorney for Plaintiff For Consideration March 15, 2024
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SHAWN VAGUE Case No.: C22-1684 RSM Plaintiff, 2:22-cv-01684-RSM vs. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, EAJA FEES AND EXPENSES, FOLLOWING REVERSAL AND REMAND (AGREED BY Defendant PARTIES)
THIS MATTER having come on before the Court,
The Court hereby directs that Plaintiff is awarded EAJA Fees in the sum of $7,933.15 and Expenses in the sum of $24.88; and that such fees and expenses shall be paid directly to Plaintiff’s counsel, Harvey Grad, at 323 Queen Anne Ave. N., Ste. 102, Seattle, WA 98109. This order shall be subject to any offset for any applicable debt(s) pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). DATED this 3rd day of May, 2024. A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Vague v. Comm’r SSA Harvey Grad, WSBA 6506
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vague v. Commissioner of Social Security (Vague v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.