Vafides v. Watson
171 So. 2d 411
This text of 171 So. 2d 411 (Vafides v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Vafides v. Watson, 171 So. 2d 411 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).
Opinion
The only substantial point presented is appellant’s contention that the court erred in failing to recognize his claimed defense of usury. We hold that upon the facts presented in this case there is no showing of usury. Pushee v. Johnson, 123 Fla. 305, 166 So. 847, 105 A.L.R. 789 (1936).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pushee v. Johnson
166 So. 847 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
171 So. 2d 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vafides-v-watson-fladistctapp-1965.