Vafides v. Watson
171 So. 2d 411
Opinion
The only substantial point presented is appellant’s contention that the court erred in failing to recognize his claimed defense of usury. We hold that upon the facts presented in this case there is no showing of usury. Pushee v. Johnson, 123 Fla. 305, 166 So. 847, 105 A.L.R. 789 (1936).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vafides v. Watson, 171 So. 2d 411 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).
171 So. 2d 411 (Vafides v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pushee v. Johnson
166 So. 847 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)