Vaduz v. Union Bank of Switzerland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vaduz v. Union Bank of Switzerland

133 A.D.2d 591, 519 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51628

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 29, 1987·Published

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kenneth L. Shorter, J.), entered May 7, 1987, dismissing the action on the ground of forum non conveniens (CPLR 327), modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of substituting the word "Zurich” for the words "Switzerland” and "Swiss” as they appear in the four decretal paragraphs of the order, and otherwise affirmed without costs. Both parties agree to the said modification should the order dismissing the action be affirmed. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kenneth L. Shorter, J.), entered May 7, 1987, dismissing the action on the ground of forum non conveniens (CPLR 327), modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of substituting the word "Zurich” for the words "Switzerland” and "Swiss” as they appear in the four decretal paragraphs of the order, and otherwise affirmed without costs. Both parties agree to the said modification should the order dismissing the action be affirmed. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.

Vaduz v. Union Bank of Switzerland, 133 A.D.2d 591, 519 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

133 A.D.2d 591 (Vaduz v. Union Bank of Switzerland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.