Vaduz v. Union Bank of Switzerland
This text of 133 A.D.2d 591 (Vaduz v. Union Bank of Switzerland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kenneth L. Shorter, J.), entered May 7, 1987, dismissing the action on the ground of forum non conveniens (CPLR 327), modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of substituting the word "Zurich” for the words "Switzerland” and "Swiss” as they appear in the four decretal paragraphs of the order, and otherwise affirmed without costs. Both parties agree to the said modification should the order dismissing the action be affirmed. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 A.D.2d 591, 519 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaduz-v-union-bank-of-switzerland-nyappdiv-1987.