Vadala v. Adams

297 So. 2d 3, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 3694
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 19, 1974·No. No. 44706·Published

Opinion

ADKINS, Chief Justice:

By petition for certiorari we have for review a decision of the District Court of [4] Appeal, Fourth District (Vadala v. Adams, 285 So.2d 49), which allegedly conflicts with a prior decision of this Court (Marley v. Saunders, 249 So.2d 30) on the same point of law. We have jurisdiction. Florida Constitution, Article V, Section 3(b)(3), F.S.A.

Pursuant to Rule 3.10, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., we have dispensed with oral argument and on authority of our recent decision in Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc., 297 So.2d 1, opinion filed June 19, 1974, the decision of the District Court of Appeal dismissing petitioner’s appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions that the District Court consider petitioner’s appeal on the merits.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and OVERTON, JT., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vadala v. Adams, 297 So. 2d 3, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 3694 (Fla. 1974).

297 So. 2d 3 (Vadala v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc.
297 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Marley v. Saunders
249 So. 2d 30 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)