Vacuum Oil Co. v. Buffalo Lubricating Oil Co.
This text of 23 F. 891 (Vacuum Oil Co. v. Buffalo Lubricating Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For the reasons stated orally at the hearing of this cause the second and twelfth claims of the patent in suit (No. 68,426, granted September 3, 1867, to Hiram B. Everest, assigned to complainant) are clearly void lor want of novelty. Inasmuch as no disclaimer has been filed, it is unnecessary to consider the validity of the other claims. After the term of a patent has expired it is too late to file a disclaimer. The suit cannot therefore be maintained, and the bill is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 F. 891, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 2011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vacuum-oil-co-v-buffalo-lubricating-oil-co-circtndny-1885.