Vacuum Engineering Co. v. Dunn

218 F. 991, 133 C.C.A. 674, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1633
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 9, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 218 F. 991 (Vacuum Engineering Co. v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vacuum Engineering Co. v. Dunn, 218 F. 991, 133 C.C.A. 674, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1633 (2d Cir. 1914).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an application to recall the mandate (209 Fed. 219, 126 C. C. A. 313), to admit as part of the record certified copies of certain foreign patents, and to issue a new mandate thereon, similar to the one in the suit of Patents Selling Company against this same defendant ([D. C.] 204 Fed. 99), where the same patents were in like manner introduced. To do this will undoubtedly be equitable, and since there is no technical, nor indeed any other, objection made to the granting of the relief prayed for, the application is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patents Selling & Exporting Co. v. Dunn
204 F. 99 (S.D. New York, 1913)
Vacuum Engineering Co. v. Dunn
209 F. 219 (Second Circuit, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 F. 991, 133 C.C.A. 674, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vacuum-engineering-co-v-dunn-ca2-1914.