Vacuum Engineering Co. v. Dunn

Second Circuit

Vacuum Engineering Co. v. Dunn

218 F. 991, 133 C.C.A. 674, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1633

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vacuum Engineering Co. v. Dunn. Read the opinion of the Court — 209 F. 219 →

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 9, 1914·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an application to recall the mandate (209 Fed. 219, 126 C. C. A. 313), to admit as part of the record certified copies of certain foreign patents, and to issue a new mandate thereon, similar to the one in the suit of Patents Selling Company against this same defendant ([D. C.] 204 Fed. 99), where the same patents were in like manner introduced. To do this will undoubtedly be equitable, and since there is no technical, nor indeed any other, objection made to the granting of the relief prayed for, the application is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an application to recall the mandate (209 Fed. 219, 126 C. C. A. 313), to admit as part of the record certified copies of certain foreign patents, and to issue a new mandate thereon, similar to the one in the suit of Patents Selling Company against this same defendant ([D. C.] 204 Fed. 99), where the same patents were in like manner introduced. To do this will undoubtedly be equitable, and since there is no technical, nor indeed any other, objection made to the granting of the relief prayed for, the application is granted.

Vacuum Engineering Co. v. Dunn, 218 F. 991, 133 C.C.A. 674, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1633 (2d Cir. 1914).

Pincite

218 F. 991 (Vacuum Engineering Co. v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related