Vachagan Mike Asatryan v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.

Opinion

JS-6

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VACHAGAN MIKE ASATRYAN, an Case No.: 2:25-cv-06846-CV (MAAx)

individual, Plaintiff, PREJUDICE vs.

AMERICA, INC. Defendants.

On January 15, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation requesting the Co ? |/to dismiss the above-captioned action with prejudice in accordance with the term and conditions of their written settlement agreement (“Stipulation’’). Doc. # 13. Th parties also request the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce and requir ° compliance with the terms of the settlement agreement. Id. ° The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation and good cause having bee found, hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Stipulation an ORDERS as follows:

1. The parties’ request to dismiss the above-captioned action wi

prejudice in accordance with the terms and conditions of their writte settlement agreement is GRANTED; and 1B 2. The Court DENIES the parties’ request to retain jurisdiction over thei settlement agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am. 511 U.S. 375, 375-76 (1994) (“[E|nforcement of the settlemen agreement is for state courts, unless there is some independent basi for federal jurisdiction] .|”); Arata v. Nu Skin Int’l, Inc., 96 F.3d 1265 1269 (9th Cir. 1996) (“[T]he mere fact that the parties agree that th court should exercise continuing jurisdiction is not binding on th court.”). 3. The Scheduling Conference currently set for January 30, 2026 1 hereby VACATED. Date: 1/26/26 By: Curation Valenzuela HONYCYNTHIA VALENZUELA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-