Vacchio v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vacchio v. Ward

160 A.D.2d 569

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A.D.2d 569 (Vacchio v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vacchio v. Ward, 160 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination of respondent Police Department of the City of New York, dated March 16, 1988, dismissing petitioner from the police force, is unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and this proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County, Norman Ryp, J., entered on or about Apr. 3, 1989), is dismissed, without costs and disbursements.

On January 3, 1985, petitioner ran out of the 75th Precinct house, with his weapon drawn, in response to a complaint from an individual previously unknown to him, that he had just been threatened by a man with a gun. After commandeering the vehicle of a fellow officer, petitioner stopped behind a civilian matching the description of the gunman, exited the vehicle with his weapon drawn, and in an apparent accident, shot and killed an unarmed civilian, Darryl Dodson.

In light of the foregoing undisputed facts, we conclude that respondent’s findings were supported by substantial evidence, and do not disturb the determination herein challenged. (See, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180-181; Matter of Bravakos v Ward, 146 AD2d 504, 505, lv denied 74 NY2d 601.)

With respect to the penalty imposed, we find that, under the circumstances presented, wherein petitioner’s rash conduct resulted in a fatal injury, the sanction of dismissal does not shock the conscience. (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 223, 233.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination of respondent Police Department of the City of New York, dated March 16, 1988, dismissing petitioner from the police force, is unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and this proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County, Norman Ryp, J., entered on or about Apr. 3, 1989), is dismissed, without costs and disbursements.

On January 3, 1985, petitioner ran out of the 75th Precinct house, with his weapon drawn, in response to a complaint from an individual previously unknown to him, that he had just been threatened by a man with a gun. After commandeering the vehicle of a fellow officer, petitioner stopped behind a civilian matching the description of the gunman, exited the vehicle with his weapon drawn, and in an apparent accident, shot and killed an unarmed civilian, Darryl Dodson.

In light of the foregoing undisputed facts, we conclude that respondent’s findings were supported by substantial evidence, and do not disturb the determination herein challenged. (See, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180-181; Matter of Bravakos v Ward, 146 AD2d 504, 505, lv denied 74 NY2d 601.)

With respect to the penalty imposed, we find that, under the circumstances presented, wherein petitioner’s rash conduct resulted in a fatal injury, the sanction of dismissal does not shock the conscience. (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 223, 233.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A.D.2d 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vacchio-v-ward-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack