Vaccaro v. Ford Motor Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vaccaro v. Ford Motor Co.

57 A.D.2d 525, 393 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11433

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 525 (Vaccaro v. Ford Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vaccaro v. Ford Motor Co., 57 A.D.2d 525, 393 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11433 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 13, 1976, granting the motion of defendant Ford Motor Co., Inc., to strike plaintiffs complaint for failure to comply with a notice of discovery and inspection to the extent of directing plaintiff to produce the items sought to be discovered, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Appellant’s time to comply with the order appealed from is extended to 15 days after the service upon him by respondent of a copy of the order entered hereon, with notice of entry. We find the order appealed from constituted a proper exercise of the court’s discretion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Lupiano and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 13, 1976, granting the motion of defendant Ford Motor Co., Inc., to strike plaintiffs complaint for failure to comply with a notice of discovery and inspection to the extent of directing plaintiff to produce the items sought to be discovered, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Appellant’s time to comply with the order appealed from is extended to 15 days after the service upon him by respondent of a copy of the order entered hereon, with notice of entry. We find the order appealed from constituted a proper exercise of the court’s discretion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Lupiano and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 525, 393 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaccaro-v-ford-motor-co-nyappdiv-1977.