Vaccarino v. Buntzis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vaccarino v. Buntzis

9 A.D.2d 959, 195 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5272

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 959 (Vaccarino v. Buntzis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vaccarino v. Buntzis, 9 A.D.2d 959, 195 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from so much of a judgment entered on a jury’s verdict as is in favor of respondent against appellant. Judgment insofar as appealed from reversed, action severed, and a new trial granted on the issues raised by the complaint and appellant’s answer thereto, with costs to abide the event, Unless respondent, within 10 days after the entry of thé order hereon, stipulate to reduce the amount of the verdict in his favor from $50,000 to $30,000, in which event, the judgment insofar as appealed from, aS so reduced, is affirmed, without costs. In Our opinion, the verdict in favor of respondent against appellant is excessive. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from so much of a judgment entered on a jury’s verdict as is in favor of respondent against appellant. Judgment insofar as appealed from reversed, action severed, and a new trial granted on the issues raised by the complaint and appellant’s answer thereto, with costs to abide the event, Unless respondent, within 10 days after the entry of thé order hereon, stipulate to reduce the amount of the verdict in his favor from $50,000 to $30,000, in which event, the judgment insofar as appealed from, aS so reduced, is affirmed, without costs. In Our opinion, the verdict in favor of respondent against appellant is excessive. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 959, 195 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaccarino-v-buntzis-nyappdiv-1959.