Vacancy in Judgeship No. 3, Northeast Central Judicial District

2013 ND 138, 835 N.W.2d 104, 2013 WL 4156630, 2013 N.D. LEXIS 140
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 14, 2013
Docket20130190
StatusPublished

This text of 2013 ND 138 (Vacancy in Judgeship No. 3, Northeast Central Judicial District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 3, Northeast Central Judicial District, 2013 ND 138, 835 N.W.2d 104, 2013 WL 4156630, 2013 N.D. LEXIS 140 (N.D. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] On June 25, 2013, Governor Jack Dalrymple officially notified the Supreme Court that the Honorable Joel D. Medd, Judge of the District Court, with chambers in Grand Forks, Northeast Central Judicial District, is resigning effective September 1, 2013. Judge Medd’s resignation and impending retirement will create a vacancy under Section 27-05-02.1, N.D.C.C.

[¶ 2] Under Section 27-05-02.1, N.D.C.C., this Court is required to review vacancies that occur and determine, within 90 days of receiving notice of a vacancy, whether the office is necessary for effective judicial administration. This Court may, consistent with that determination, order the vacancy filled or order the vacant office transferred to another judicial district in which an additional judge is necessary. Effective July 1, 2013, the Supreme Court also has the authority to abolish a vacant judicial office, with or without a transfer.

[¶ 3] Under N.D. Sup.Ct. Admin. R. 7.2, notice of a written consultation with attorneys and judges and other interested persons in the Northeast Central Judicial District was posted July 1, 2013, on the website of the Supreme Court. Notice was also electronically provided to all presiding judges of the state. Written comments on the vacancy were permitted through August 1, 2013. This procedure is sufficient for purposes of the consultation required under Section 27-05-02.1, N.D.C.C.

[¶ 4] A Report containing population and caseload trends, and other criteria identified in N.D. Sup.Ct. Admin. R. 7.2, Section 4 was filed July 24, 2013, by the Northeast Central Judicial District.

[¶ 5] The Court received several comments supporting the retention of the office in the Northeast Central Judicial District. There were no filings received suggesting the vacant office be transferred from Grand Forks or the district.

[¶ 6] Under the criteria of Section 4 of N.D. Sup.Ct. Admin. R. 7.2, the Court has considered all submissions received by the Court and its own administrative records on state-wide weighted caseload data.

[¶ 7] Based on the record before us, this Court determines this office is necessary for effective judicial administration in its present location.

[If 8] IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Judgeship No. 3 at Grand Forks in the Northeast Central Judicial District be filled in the manner provided by N.D.C.C. Chapter 27-25.

[¶ 9] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2013 ND 138, 835 N.W.2d 104, 2013 WL 4156630, 2013 N.D. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vacancy-in-judgeship-no-3-northeast-central-judicial-district-nd-2013.