V & v. Industries Inc. v. D & S Precision Work Inc.
This text of V & v. Industries Inc. v. D & S Precision Work Inc. (V & v. Industries Inc. v. D & S Precision Work Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued July 20, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00273-CV ——————————— V & V INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant V. D & S PRECISION WORK, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2016-28854
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, V & V Industries, Inc., filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s
February 25, 2021 final judgment. On September 23, 2021, appellant filed a motion
to abate the appeal, stating that the parties had reached an agreement to settle their
dispute, and requesting that the appeal be abated for a period of three months to allow appellant and appellee, D & S Precision Work, Inc. to perform the terms of
their agreement. On September 30, 2021, the Court granted appellant’s motion,
abating the appeal.
In the Court’s September 30, 2021 order, the parties were directed to file a
motion to reinstate and dismiss the appeal, or motion to reinstate and proceed with
the appeal, within ninety days of the date of the order. However, the parties failed
to file any motion in response to the Court’s September 30, 2021 order. Accordingly,
on June 27, 2023, the Court issued an order of continuing abatement directing the
parties to file, within ten days of the date of the order, a motion to reinstate and
dismiss the appeal, or otherwise advise the Court on the status of the proceedings.
The parties were further notified that the failure to respond to the Court’s June 27,
2023 order would result in dismissal of the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c)
(allowing dismissal of civil appeal where “appellant has failed to comply with . . . a
court order”).
On July 6, 2023, appellee filed a “Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to
[Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] 41(a)(1)(A)(i).” In its notice, appellee notified the
Court that “the above-captioned action [was] voluntarily dismissed against
[appellant] V & V Industries[,] Inc.” Appellee’s notice does not seek any relief from
this Court. However, assuming the Court were to construe appellee’s notice as a
motion to dismiss the appeal, appellee’s notice does not include a certificate of
2 conference representing that appellee conferred with appellant, or that appellant is
unopposed to dismissal of the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5). Appellee’s
notice also does not provide the Court with a basis to dismiss the appeal pursuant to
the Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1, which governs the voluntary dismissal
of appeals, because it was not filed by appellant or by agreement of the parties. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). No other party responded to the Court’s June 27, 2023
order.
We therefore conclude that the parties have not adequately responded to the
Court’s June 27, 2023 order, and the appeal should be dismissed for failure to
comply with an order of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
Accordingly, the Court reinstates the case to the Court’s active docket and
dismisses the appeal for failure to comply with the Court’s June 27, 2023 order. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
V & v. Industries Inc. v. D & S Precision Work Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/v-v-industries-inc-v-d-s-precision-work-inc-texapp-2023.