V. Schwan & Co. v. Forgey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

V. Schwan & Co. v. Forgey

25 So. 465, 51 La. Ann. 752, 1899 La. LEXIS 465

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 11, 1899

DocketNo. 13,153

StatusPublished

This text of 25 So. 465 (V. Schwan & Co. v. Forgey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

V. Schwan & Co. v. Forgey, 25 So. 465, 51 La. Ann. 752, 1899 La. LEXIS 465 (La. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nictiolls, O. J.

We do not think this case calls for the exercise of, the powers vested by Article 101 of the Constitution, in the Supreme Court, to have the judgment of the Court of Appeals reviewed. It. presents no exceptional features calling for action on our part.

The principal ground of complaint seems to be that portion of the judgment which dissolves plaintiffs injunction with damages. It is-claimed that there was no basis for damages, as the injunction was never made operative or enforced. Plaintiff made no attempt to have-this error (if error it was) rectified by an application for a new trial, or an amendment of judgment. This complaint involved only twenty-five dollars, and plaintiffs should, at least, have sought relief on rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nictiolls, O. J.

We do not think this case calls for the exercise of, the powers vested by Article 101 of the Constitution, in the Supreme Court, to have the judgment of the Court of Appeals reviewed. It. presents no exceptional features calling for action on our part.

The principal ground of complaint seems to be that portion of the judgment which dissolves plaintiffs injunction with damages. It is-claimed that there was no basis for damages, as the injunction was never made operative or enforced. Plaintiff made no attempt to have-this error (if error it was) rectified by an application for a new trial, or an amendment of judgment. This complaint involved only twenty-five dollars, and plaintiffs should, at least, have sought relief on rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 So. 465, 51 La. Ann. 752, 1899 La. LEXIS 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/v-schwan-co-v-forgey-la-1899.