V. P. J., Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

V. P. J., Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

20 A.D.2d 796, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4261

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 796 (V. P. J., Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

V. P. J., Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 20 A.D.2d 796, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by the respondent Liquor Authority, pursuant to statute (CPLR 5704, subd. [a]), to modify an order to show cause, issued ex parte in this proceeding, signed by a Justice of the Supreme Court on February 27, 1964, by striking out the following provision: “ordered, that pending the hearing of this application, and without prejudice to its position the New York State Liquor Authority be and it hereby is directed to renew the said licenses held by the petitioners and it is further directed to deliver a renewal of such licenses commencing March 1, 1964, to the petitioners upon the service of this order upon the respondent.” Motion granted; the order is modified by striking out said provision. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by the respondent Liquor Authority, pursuant to statute (CPLR 5704, subd. [a]), to modify an order to show cause, issued ex parte in this proceeding, signed by a Justice of the Supreme Court on February 27, 1964, by striking out the following provision: “ordered, that pending the hearing of this application, and without prejudice to its position the New York State Liquor Authority be and it hereby is directed to renew the said licenses held by the petitioners and it is further directed to deliver a renewal of such licenses commencing March 1, 1964, to the petitioners upon the service of this order upon the respondent.” Motion granted; the order is modified by striking out said provision. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 796, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/v-p-j-inc-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1964.