V. Melvin Hill, A/K/A Melvin Taylor, A/K/A Marvin Grant, Thomas Ward, Honorable

979 F.2d 847, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35172, 1992 WL 337085
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 1992
Docket92-7006
StatusUnpublished

This text of 979 F.2d 847 (V. Melvin Hill, A/K/A Melvin Taylor, A/K/A Marvin Grant, Thomas Ward, Honorable) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
V. Melvin Hill, A/K/A Melvin Taylor, A/K/A Marvin Grant, Thomas Ward, Honorable, 979 F.2d 847, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35172, 1992 WL 337085 (4th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

979 F.2d 847

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
v.
Melvin HILL, a/k/a Melvin Taylor, a/k/a Marvin Grant,
Petitioner-Appellant,
Thomas WARD, Honorable, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 92-7006.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 26, 1992
Decided: November 17, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Melvin Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Hill seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Ward, No. CA-92-2348-H (D. Md. Sept. 11, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gardner (John Sterling, Jr.) v. Dixon (Gary)
979 F.2d 847 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
979 F.2d 847, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35172, 1992 WL 337085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/v-melvin-hill-aka-melvin-taylor-aka-marvin-grant-thomas-ward-ca4-1992.