V-ME MEDIA, INC. v. URPI RIOS
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 22, 2021.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D20-1555
Lower Tribunal No. 18-13799
V-ME Media, Inc., et al., Petitioners,
vs.
Urpi Rios,
Respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica A. Diaz, Judge.
Sodhi Spoont PLLC, and Eric M. Sodhi and Joshua L. Spoont, for petitioners.
RC Law Group, and Ria N. Chattergoon (Hollywood), for respondent.
Before SCALES, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed. Piquet v. Clareway Props. Ltd., 314 So. 3d 423, 427 (Fla.
3d DCA 2020) (quoting Damsky v. Univ. of Miami, 152 So. 3d 789, 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)) (internal citations omitted) (“[T]he Florida Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that [a] finding that the petitioning party has suffered an irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal is a condition precedent to invoking a district court’s certiorari jurisdiction.”); see also Bd. of Trs. of Internal Improvement Tr. Fund v. Am. Educ. Enters., LLC, 99 So. 3d 450, 456 (Fla. 2012) (internal citations and quotations omitted) (“Certiorari jurisdiction does not lie to review every erroneous discovery order, and overbreadth alone is not a basis on which such jurisdiction will be granted.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
V-ME MEDIA, INC. v. URPI RIOS (V-ME MEDIA, INC. v. URPI RIOS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.