V-ME MEDIA, INC. v. URPI RIOS
This text of V-ME MEDIA, INC. v. URPI RIOS (V-ME MEDIA, INC. v. URPI RIOS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 22, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1555 Lower Tribunal No. 18-13799 ________________
V-ME Media, Inc., et al., Petitioners,
vs.
Urpi Rios, Respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica A. Diaz, Judge.
Sodhi Spoont PLLC, and Eric M. Sodhi and Joshua L. Spoont, for petitioners.
RC Law Group, and Ria N. Chattergoon (Hollywood), for respondent.
Before SCALES, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Dismissed. Piquet v. Clareway Props. Ltd., 314 So. 3d 423, 427 (Fla.
3d DCA 2020) (quoting Damsky v. Univ. of Miami, 152 So. 3d 789, 792 (Fla.
3d DCA 2014)) (internal citations omitted) (“[T]he Florida Supreme Court has
repeatedly emphasized that [a] finding that the petitioning party has suffered
an irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal is a condition
precedent to invoking a district court’s certiorari jurisdiction.”); see also Bd.
of Trs. of Internal Improvement Tr. Fund v. Am. Educ. Enters., LLC, 99 So.
3d 450, 456 (Fla. 2012) (internal citations and quotations omitted) (“Certiorari
jurisdiction does not lie to review every erroneous discovery order, and
overbreadth alone is not a basis on which such jurisdiction will be granted.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
V-ME MEDIA, INC. v. URPI RIOS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/v-me-media-inc-v-urpi-rios-fladistctapp-2021.