V. Loewers Gambrinus Brewery Co. v. Anderson

Supreme Court

V. Loewers Gambrinus Brewery Co. v. Anderson

282 U.S. 823, 51 S. Ct. 76

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in V. Loewers Gambrinus Brewery Co. v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 282 U.S. 638 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 20, 1930·No. No. 352·Published

Opinion

The petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is granted, limited to the question [824]*824whether the petitioner is entitled to any deduction for obsolescence of its tangible property in the taxable years 1918 and 1919 under § 234 (a) (7) of the Revenue Act of 1918.

Messrs. Arthur B. Hyman and Karl D. Loos for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngquist and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, J. Louis Monarch, and Norman D. Keller for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is granted, limited to the question [824]*824whether the petitioner is entitled to any deduction for obsolescence of its tangible property in the taxable years 1918 and 1919 under § 234 (a) (7) of the Revenue Act of 1918.

Messrs. Arthur B. Hyman and Karl D. Loos for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngquist and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, J. Louis Monarch, and Norman D. Keller for respondent.

V. Loewers Gambrinus Brewery Co. v. Anderson, 282 U.S. 823, 51 S. Ct. 76 (1930).

Pincite

282 U.S. 823 (V. Loewers Gambrinus Brewery Co. v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.