V. F. V. Construction Co. v. Aetna Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

V. F. V. Construction Co. v. Aetna Insurance

56 A.D.2d 598, 391 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10669

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1977·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

In an action on a fire insurance policy, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 30, 1976, which denied their motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. On the record presented here, we find that triable issues of fact exist. The evidence indicates that plaintiffs’ premises may have been damaged by arson and that plaintiffs may have had a motive to see their property destroyed by fire. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action on a fire insurance policy, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 30, 1976, which denied their motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. On the record presented here, we find that triable issues of fact exist. The evidence indicates that plaintiffs’ premises may have been damaged by arson and that plaintiffs may have had a motive to see their property destroyed by fire. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

V. F. V. Construction Co. v. Aetna Insurance, 56 A.D.2d 598, 391 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

56 A.D.2d 598 (V. F. V. Construction Co. v. Aetna Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related