v. Dill

Supreme Court of New Jersey

v. Dill

6 N.J.L. 205

DecidedMay 15, 1822

StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.J.L. 205 (v. Dill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

v. Dill, 6 N.J.L. 205 (N.J. 1822).

Pincite

Opinion

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

You are not entitled to judgment; you do not state that you served the rule upon tho defendant’s attorney.

Ewing. The defendant’s attorney was in court at the time the motion was made, and knew of it.

Per Curiam.

We are all of opinion, that a service of the rule is necessary, and even if the defendant’s attorney is in court when the motion is made. We cannot enter into an examination, whether he was in court or not. Besides, he might have been engaged at the time, and not have heard it.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

You are not entitled to judgment; you do not state that you served the rule upon tho defendant’s attorney.

Ewing. The defendant’s attorney was in court at the time the motion was made, and knew of it.

Per Curiam.

We are all of opinion, that a service of the rule is necessary, and even if the defendant’s attorney is in court when the motion is made. We cannot enter into an examination, whether he was in court or not. Besides, he might have been engaged at the time, and not have heard it.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 N.J.L. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/v-dill-nj-1822.