V. Casazza & Bro. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

V. Casazza & Bro. v. United States

20 Cust. Ct. 290, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 187

United States Customs Court·Decided March 25, 1948·No. No. 52238; protest 94151-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall J.

On rehearing no evidence was produced and the case was submitted upon the record as originally made. In Morales & Co. Sucs v. [291]*291United States (54 Treas. Dec. 425, T. D. 43062) it was held that the inspector's official report to the collector is presumptively correct. In the absence of direct evidence contradicting the inspector’s report in this case it was found that the original decision reported in Abstract 50590 should be and the same is herebv adhered to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall J.

On rehearing no evidence was produced and the case was submitted upon the record as originally made. In Morales & Co. Sucs v. [291]*291United States (54 Treas. Dec. 425, T. D. 43062) it was held that the inspector's official report to the collector is presumptively correct. In the absence of direct evidence contradicting the inspector’s report in this case it was found that the original decision reported in Abstract 50590 should be and the same is herebv adhered to.

V. Casazza & Bro. v. United States, 20 Cust. Ct. 290, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 187 (cusc 1948).

Pincite

20 Cust. Ct. 290 (V. Casazza & Bro. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.