V. Casazza & Bro. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

V. Casazza & Bro. v. United States

20 Cust. Ct. 290, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 187

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 25, 1948

DocketNo. 52238; protest 94151-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Cust. Ct. 290 (V. Casazza & Bro. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

V. Casazza & Bro. v. United States, 20 Cust. Ct. 290, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 187 (cusc 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall J.

On rehearing no evidence was produced and the case was submitted upon the record as originally made. In Morales & Co. Sucs v. [291]*291United States (54 Treas. Dec. 425, T. D. 43062) it was held that the inspector's official report to the collector is presumptively correct. In the absence of direct evidence contradicting the inspector’s report in this case it was found that the original decision reported in Abstract 50590 should be and the same is herebv adhered to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall J.

On rehearing no evidence was produced and the case was submitted upon the record as originally made. In Morales & Co. Sucs v. [291]*291United States (54 Treas. Dec. 425, T. D. 43062) it was held that the inspector's official report to the collector is presumptively correct. In the absence of direct evidence contradicting the inspector’s report in this case it was found that the original decision reported in Abstract 50590 should be and the same is herebv adhered to.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Cust. Ct. 290, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/v-casazza-bro-v-united-states-cusc-1948.