V. A. Nagle & Son, Inc. v. East Hudson Parkway Authority
This text of 72 A.D.2d 819 (V. A. Nagle & Son, Inc. v. East Hudson Parkway Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel respondent East Hudson Parkway Authority to award petitioner a certain contract, in which said respondent cross-moved to dismiss the petition, petitioner appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July l4, 1978, which, upon granting the cross motion, inter alia, dismissed the petition and (2) an order of the same court, dated September 22, 1978, which denied its motion "to renew and reargue” (the motion was in fact one for reargument). Appeal from the order dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Judgment affirmed. Respondents are awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. Crediting petitioner’s allegations, there is still no basis to infer either collusion or arbitrariness on the part of respondent East Hudson Parkway Authority (see Washington Moving & Stor. Co. v Board of Educ., 51 AD2d 1038). The cross motion to dismiss was properly granted. Rabin, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 A.D.2d 819, 423 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/v-a-nagle-son-inc-v-east-hudson-parkway-authority-nyappdiv-1979.