Uzzi v. Kennedy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Uzzi v. Kennedy

8 A.D.2d 711, 188 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8579

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 711 (Uzzi v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Uzzi v. Kennedy, 8 A.D.2d 711, 188 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to permit the proceeding to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points, on condition that the petitioner serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points upon the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of petitioner’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before September 8, 1959, with notice of argument for the October 1959 Term of this court, said proceeding to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted insofar as to permit the proceeding to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points, on condition that the petitioner serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points upon the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of petitioner’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before September 8, 1959, with notice of argument for the October 1959 Term of this court, said proceeding to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 711, 188 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uzzi-v-kennedy-nyappdiv-1959.