Uzoukwu v. Prince George's Community College (PGCC) Board of Trustees ex rel. Yeoman

623 F. App'x 604
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 1, 2015·No. No. 15-1774·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chinyere Uzoukwu appeals the district court’s order denying her postjudgment motion for leave to file an amended complaint. We review a district court’s denial of a motion to amend a complaint for an abuse of discretion, Laber v. Harvey, 438 F.3d 404, 428 (4th Cir.2006) (en banc). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Uzoukwu, v. Prince George’s Cmty. Coll. Bd. of Trs., No. 8:12-cv-02199-JFM (D.Md. June 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Uzoukwu v. Prince George's Community College (PGCC) Board of Trustees ex rel. Yeoman, 623 F. App'x 604 (4th Cir. 2015).

623 F. App'x 604 (Uzoukwu v. Prince George's Community College (PGCC) Board of Trustees ex rel. Yeoman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related