Uzich v. E. & G. Brooke Iron Co.

167 F.2d 633, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2466
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 5, 1948·No. No. 9513·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The circumstances of this case are indeed unusual. They compel the conclusion that the court below did not err in giving judgment for the defendant under Rule 50(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Uzich v. E. & G. Brooke Iron Co., 167 F.2d 633, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2466 (3d Cir. 1948).

167 F.2d 633 (Uzich v. E. & G. Brooke Iron Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hixon v. Mathieu
377 A.2d 112 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1977)