Uzhca v. Derham

Ohio Supreme Court

Uzhca v. Derham

100 Ohio St. 3d 323

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 17, 2003

DocketNo. 2002-0850

StatusPublished

This text of 100 Ohio St. 3d 323 (Uzhca v. Derham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Uzhca v. Derham, 100 Ohio St. 3d 323 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 2003-Ohio-5849, 797 N.E.2d 1256.

Moyer, C.J., Ford, Sundermann, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Donald R. Ford, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J. J. Howard Sundermann Jr., J., of the First Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 2003-Ohio-5849, 797 N.E.2d 1256.

Moyer, C.J., Ford, Sundermann, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Donald R. Ford, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J. J. Howard Sundermann Jr., J., of the First Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 Ohio St. 3d 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uzhca-v-derham-ohio-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack