Uzenda v. Stroman

34 F. App'x 126
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 10, 2002·No. No. 01-2326·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jara C. Uzenda seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Uzenda’s motion for leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Uzenda v. Stroman, No. CA-01-2212-4-22 (D.S.C. June 25, 2001; Oct. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Uzenda v. Stroman, 34 F. App'x 126 (4th Cir. 2002).

34 F. App'x 126 (Uzenda v. Stroman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Wills
200 F. App'x 190 (Fourth Circuit, 2006)
Wills v. Smith
178 F. App'x 123 (Third Circuit, 2006)