Uzenda v. Stroman
This text of Uzenda v. Stroman (Uzenda v. Stroman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2326
JARA C. UZENDA, a/k/a Jara Uzenda Gobbi,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RALPH STROMAN; BANK OF NEW YORK; PETER D. KORN; SUNTRUST MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-01-2212-4-22)
Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: May 10, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jara C. Uzenda, Appellant Pro Se. Arrigo Paul Carotti, MCCUTCHEON, MCCUTCHEON & BAXTER, P.A., Conway, South Carolina; John Sanford Kay, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jara C. Uzenda seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Uzenda’s
motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Uzenda v.
Stroman, No. CA-01-2212-4-22 (D.S.C. June 25, 2001; Oct. 23, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Uzenda v. Stroman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uzenda-v-stroman-ca4-2002.